I have SOPs…now what?

I have SOPs…now what?
The Trademark 'Smooth Operator' Cog in light sage green.

TL;DR: Creating SOPs is only half the battle. To make them actually work for your team, you need four key pieces: a searchable SOP library, consistent enforcement, an update rhythm, and integration into a broader process map. When your SOPs lead to consistent, high-quality work, independent problem solving, and a trustworthy home for institutional knowledge that stays put as team members change, you have a system that works.

Why Isn’t Your Team Using Your SOPs?

I’m guessing you already know that good documentation is important when you have a team. You’ve maybe even painstakingly created a pile of them. Every client I’ve ever worked with has written things down somewhere.

What hurts more than the process of writing an SOP? Watching it gather dust afterwards.

Here are the biggest gaps I see:

    • People can’t find them

    • People can’t trust them

    • People don’t know they exist or forget about them

    • It’s easier to just ask someone who knows the answer

    • The SOPs are confusing, way too long, or missing information

We don’t want this for you. We want every piece of your operational infrastructure to support you and work in the way you intended. You may just be missing a step or two.

What Do You Need After You Have Your SOPs?

After you’ve written a first batch of SOPs, four steps will help you integrate them into how your team works together:

1. A Place to Organize Your SOPs

If your SOPs feel like a pile of books that people have to sort through to find a single piece of information, you’ll find that your team is going to much prefer pinging you on Slack instead. A searchable library that acts as a single source of truth for the most accurate SOPs and resources for your company is a nonnegotiable step, and folders aren’t enough. For more, check out my full post about SOP libraries here.

 

2. Consistent Enforcement

As a leader, I sometimes forget that just because I created something and shared it once with the team doesn’t mean my job is done. If something isn’t reinforced until it’s a habit, it’s very likely to fizzle out.

Recently, I interviewed a client’s team members to get their perspective on what needed to improve at the company. One thing they shared (with multiple examples) was that the owner would read a book, get excited, and announce some new operational initiative, only for that thing to slowly fade to nothing. He would ask them to, say, share a weekly update email, and they would for a while. Then one day, they just stopped – and nothing happened. They blamed him for this. As an operator, part of me wanted to snap, “he asked you to send them, so why did you stop?” but I knew that they were right. It was his job to help them understand why it mattered, to reinforce their work when they did it right, and bring their attention to it when they missed it. People won’t send things out into the void for long. Likewise, if you create beautiful SOPs for them but then still answer all their questions, it will be easier for them to keep their old habits than to build new ones.

Intentional change management and enforcement will help your team integrate your SOPs into how they work.

Here’s what this looks like:

    • Clearly state the outcome your SOPs are meant to create and why that’s good news for them (having a place to go to get answers right away and being able to cover for each other during vacations and emergencies are two main benefits)

    • Bring it up at every team meeting until it’s truly ingrained

    • If people are asking you questions that they can find in the SOP, don’t answer them. Send them to the SOP.

    • If something is changing in the process, ask people to note the change in the SOP.

    • If people are missing steps that are in the SOP, ask them to reference the SOP and try again rather than simply fixing it or telling them specifically what’s missing.

Make sure that the door is open for your team to say, “Hey, I hate this part of the SOP,” or “This section was confusing,” or “This is outdated.” Reward constructive feedback. Let them see you using the SOPs, too.

And one final note: if you write an SOP a certain way, and someone follows the process, don’t go and change things. This may sound too obvious, but believe me: I’m saying it because I’ve seen it. As the owner, you’re used to having total control over your domain. You can make exceptions or change your mind whenever you feel like it. But when a team is in the mix, this is a recipe for disempowerment. If they follow the process in an SOP and then watch you undermine their actions, they’ll stop following the SOP and come to you to make the decision instead. Down this path, there be dragons.

 

3. An Update Rhythm

You’ll want to avoid a Wikipedia situation where everyone has the ability to change anything at any time. At a very high volume of people, the equilibrium usually settles somewhere generally accurate, but if you have a smaller team than that, the variability can cause real problems.

First, each SOP needs a single owner. One person should be responsible for the document’s accuracy and for making edits on the rhythm you decide.

Next, you’ll want a rhythm for how often updates happen. If you have a lot of SOPs, one option is to break them into four groups and edit/update a batch each quarter. Each SOP will then get attention once a year. When the SOP is open for edits, you can synthesize comments, check for updates, get approval if needed, and then lock it again until the next review.

Finally, you’ll want a way for comments or updates to be gathered in real time. If someone notices a gap or has a question, would you like them to comment on the doc itself, or fill out a form? Either way, these comments can build up over time and then get integrated at the next review.

 

4. A Birds-Eye View

One thing I say a lot is that you want to give your team a car, not a bucket of car parts. If you have a pile of SOPs but no way to see how they work together to make a cohesive unit, your team will be able to do their individual tasks but will struggle to see how it all hangs together.

We use process maps so that people can see the whole company in a visual format.

The way that we think about it is that every element on the process map has an SOP associated with it. It allows people to see, “Okay, I’m doing this one thing, and it’s one of four things that we do in this category,” or “Here’s what comes before and after what I do and why these steps matter.”

When people see the big picture, it’s easier for them to expand their leadership over time and to see the deeper meaning in individual tasks.

How Do You Know If Your SOPs Are Working?

Every system is perfectly designed to get the outcome it gets. If you are getting the outcomes below, what you’re doing with your SOPs is great.

Here are the outcomes we’re going for:


    1. Your team is consistently completing their work without missing steps
    2. Your team is solving their own problems using the documentation that you’ve created, and they trust it
    3. If you have multiple people doing a similar job, their work is consistent
    4. It’s easy to determine success in an objective way so you don’t end up with perception problems where they feel like they’re doing a great job and you feel like they are not. You can go straight to the SOP, to the outcomes and the success metrics, and say, “Did you reach these outcomes according to the success metrics?” That’s a yes or no question based on something black and white.
    5. When someone is out of the office, other team members can get things done at a decent level without a lot of coaching and knowledge transfer beforehand
    6. If someone leaves the company, you don’t feel like they’re taking all of that institutional knowledge out the door with them where you have to rebuild from scratch for the next person
    7. You have an easy path to integrating changes in your documentation when a process shifts
 

Ultimately, the goal is for your SOPs to feel like an indispensable tool to the whole team on a daily basis. Most people don’t love making SOPs, and that’s okay – let’s make the pain worth it! We’re cheering you on.


FAQs

What’s the most common reason SOPs fail?

The biggest gap I see on the ground is a lack of enforcement and change management. Leaders create SOPs with great intentions but don’t consistently reinforce their use. When team members ask questions that are answered in the SOP, leaders answer directly instead of redirecting to the documentation. Without sustained reinforcement, SOPs become forgotten files instead of daily tools.

 

Can AI help here?

Absolutely! For creation, our free Custom GPT SOP builder will help you create strong SOPs in minutes. For access, AI search functions in your SOP library can help people find information more easily. Something like Notion allows for this, and you’ll likely find this function in most tools that are built for storing SOPs.

 

Isn’t it faster to allow for immediate SOP edits?

Potentially. Each SOP should have a single owner responsible for updates, and we recommend a planned update rhythm, but you can also try allowing that single person to have edit access year-round. Limiting edit access to one person prevents conflicting changes and maintains document integrity; the rhythm can vary based on what works for you.

 

Why can’t I just use folders for storing SOPs? Why do I need a library?

Folders cause a few problems: there are often multiple folders where something could logically be stored, search is limited to the document title (unlike a library that allows for searches by keyword), and if you have previous drafts, it’s easy for people to make their way to the wrong document. A library allows for broader search, a single home for everything, and confidence that you’re looking at the most accurate version of a document.

 

How do process maps relate to SOPs?

Process maps give your team the big picture of how work flows through your company. Each element on the process map corresponds to an SOP. This helps people understand not just how to do their specific task, but where their work fits in the larger system, what comes before and after, and how their role connects to others.

 

What if my team resists using SOPs?

Start with change management. Explain why you’re implementing SOPs and what benefits they’ll see. Most importantly, model the behavior you want: refer to SOPs yourself, redirect questions to documentation, and ask for their feedback on what’s working and what’s not. Keep the door open for honest conversation about pain points, and adjust based on what you learn.

 

If you have team members who see themselves as mavericks who can’t be constrained by checklists, you have a few options. If they’re truly exceptional in their core role and just struggle with the ops side of things, maybe an assistant could help fill in the gaps. If there are areas where creative freedom is useful, you can adapt the SOP to create room for decision-making in specific areas. If you suspect you’re just dealing with a lack of discipline, helping them understand the purpose of a process and holding them accountable to the outcomes and success metrics you’ve defined will either make it clear that they’re not a good fit or help them build the muscles to operate within the systems you’ve built.